We noted earlier that the recent drop in labor force participation — the percentage of people 16 or older who are working or looking for work — reflects not only the economic downturn and lack of job opportunities, but also the fact that more baby boomers are hitting retirement age.
To measure the effect of demographics on labor force participation, we’ve updated a data series that the Labor Department published a decade ago that controls for the shifting age mix of the population (that is, what share of the population is in each age group). We found that — if today’s age mix were the same as in 2000 — the labor force participation rate would be higher than today’s 64 percent and would’ve fallen less sharply in recent years (see graph).
Although the “headline” rate includes everybody age 16 or older, labor force participation peaks at ages 25 through 54. Many teens and young adults choose school over work, while many people 55 or older leave the workforce when they retire or become disabled. Crucially, the baby boom generation — the huge cohort of Americans born between 1946 and 1964 — is swiftly moving into that older group. And that’s putting downward pressure on labor force participation.
Our findings support the conclusions of the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) and analysts at the Federal Reserve banks of Chicago and Kansas City, who find that an aging population accounts for an important piece of the recent drop in labor force participation. Those experts generally conclude that about half of the drop in labor force participation since 2007 (the start of the economic downturn), and about a third of the drop since 2000 (when the rate hit its all-time high), stems from an aging population…
Related Posts
Participation Historical Paterns: The unemployment rate today would be 9.3%
Some people — notably Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney — have argued that to get the “real” unemployment rate, we should add back all the people who have left the labor force and consider them unemployed. Doing that gives an unemployment rate of around 11%, depending on what month you choose for a baseline. But … Continue reading »
US – The number of workers age 55 and up grew by 3.5 million from September 2009 to September 2012
The number of workers age 55 and up grew by 3.5 million from September 2009 to September 2012. That represents the lion’s share of the gain of 4.2 million for all workers 16 and older, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Two factors help explain the trend. First: demographics. In the three years ended … Continue reading »
Demographic Alert: Older Workers Will Soon Exceed Younger Workers in Numbers in US
For the very first time in history, the number of workers over age 55 will surpass the number of workers ages 25 to 34. Since 1990, the number of older workers has been increasing steadily, while the number of younger workers in that specific age cohort has been steadily declining. It’s just a matter of … Continue reading »
Declining Participation Rate | Any bounceback in the participation rate will be fairly small
The Chart Below from Calculated Risk shows the actual annual participation rate and two forecasts based on changes in demographics. Now that the leading edge of the baby boom generation is starting to retire, the participation rate is declining and will probably continue to decline for the next 20 years. Note: the yellow line is … Continue reading »
Skrinking Labor Force Participation | Unemployment rate would be 11.1% or even 13.1%
If the same percentage of adults were in the workforce today as when Barack Obama took office, the unemployment rate would be 11.1 percent. If the percentage was where it was when George W. Bush took office, the unemployment rate would be 13.1 percent. Source: Read More @ The incredible shrinking labor force – The Washington Post.
Boomers held 11.3 jobs from age 18 to age 46, nearly half of these jobs held from ages 18 to 24.
The average person born in the latter years of the baby boom (1957-1964) held 11.3 jobs from age 18 to age 46, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Nearly half of these jobs were held from ages 18 to 24. These findings are from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1979; a survey of 9,964 men … Continue reading »
Job Market Monitor 
wonderful put up, very informative. I wonder why the other experts of this sector don’t understand this. You must proceed your writing. I am sure, you have a huge readers’ base already!
Posted by Amedar Consulting Group | November 14, 2012, 10:19 pm