Last federal budget outlined multiple changes coming to the employment insurance program that combined will have a total cost this year of $1.02 billion and almost $1.45 billion next year. 
Here are five key changes:
1) The Liberals are promising to add five weeks of eligibility up to a maximum of 50 weeks of regular benefits to unemployed workers in a dozen regions of the country that have seen unemployment rates rise over a sustained period. Long-tenured workers, who tend to be older and haven’t dipped into employment insurance in years, will be eligible for 20 additional weeks of benefits up to a maximum of 70 weeks. This starts July 1, is retroactive to claims from January 2015, and is in place until 2017.
Total cost over two years: $582 million.
2) Normally, new employment insurance recipients wait two weeks for their first payment. Think of it as the deductible on the insurance plan. The government is going to cut that waiting period to one week, speed up processing application processing times, and put money into government call centres to reduce the amount of time people spend on hold waiting to talk to someone.
Total cost over two years: $1.05 billion, of which $957 million is for the one-week pledge.
3) New entrants to the workforce (think young workers getting their first jobs) or re-entrants (think stay-at-home parents who are going back into the workforce) will be required to work between 420 to 700 hours over the previous 52 weeks to qualify for employment insurance, depending on labour conditions in their area of the country. That’s a reduction from the current 910 hours.
Total cost over two years: $567 million.
4) The “working while on claim” pilot project is being extended, as the government continues to assess whether letting claimants who work keep more of their benefits helps them transition off employment insurance and into a permanent job. The project claws back just 50 cents for every dollar they earn, up to a maximum of 90 per cent of their weekly insurable earnings used to calculate EI.
Total cost over two years: $129 million.
5) Workers whose companies are facing the prospect of layoffs because of tough economic conditions can opt to work fewer hours and receive employment insurance benefits up to a maximum of 38 weeks. The work-sharing arrangements were popular during the recession in the 2009-2010 fiscal year to prevent layoffs, and now the Liberals are going to expand the program to a maximum 76 weeks.
Total cost over two years: $126 million.
Chosen excerpts by Job Market Monitor. Read the whole story at 5 things to know about changes to employment insurance program | Globalnews.ca
Related Posts
Employment Insurance in Canada – 39.0% of the unemployed in 2014 had not contributed
The rate of eligibility for receiving regular Employment Insurance (EI) benefits was 83.1% in 2014, down from 85.8% in 2013, but in line with the 83.0% average seen over the previous 10 years. The decline in 2014 was most notable among youths aged 15 to 24 and men of all ages. To be eligible to receive regular benefits, unemployed individuals must have contributed to the EI program, met … Continue reading
Employment Insurance (EI) in Canada – The current system is broken former chief actuary says
Only about 40 per cent of Canada’s 1.3 million unemployed people now receive benefits. And among those who do, the range of benefits given in the largest labour-market program in the country varies widely among regions. The current system is broken, said Michel Bédard, who co-wrote a paper to be released Thursday with economics professor … Continue reading
Canada – The Employment Insurance Operating Account
The Employment Insurance Operating Account was created on 1 January 2009. It is a consolidated specific purpose account, meaning that it includes program-related revenues credited and expenses charged to this account under the Employment Insurance Act.8 EI premiums are paid into the Consolidated Revenue Fund (CRF), which includes general government revenues such as taxes,9 and … Continue reading
Canada / Create the Employment Insurance Savings Account says the Canadian Taxpayers Federation
The Canadian Taxpayers Federation suggests that working Canadians be entitled to keep the $4,277 currently plundered from them and their employer every year in EI premiums, rather than sending the money to Ottawa, to be processed and shipped elsewhere Continue reading
Canada – L’assurance-emploi doit se recentrer sur le remplacement du revenu des personnes ayant perdu leur emploi selon un rapport de l’IRPP
Sommaire ■ L’assurance-emploi doit se recentrer sur le remplacement du revenu des personnes ayant perdu leur emploi, les autres mandats (congé de maladie, congé parental, formation, etc.) devant faire l’objet de régimes distincts. ■ Elle doit être gérée par une caisse autonome et financée à parts égales par les cotisations des employeurs et des employés. … Continue reading
The ‘Optimal’ unemployment insurance
Benefit-extension programmes reduce competition for jobs. Since the programme induces eligible job seekers to search less hard, non-eligible job seekers face lower competition and find jobs more easily Continue reading
Canada | Employment Insurance | Nationwide Entrance Requirements and Benefit Entitlement Period
“Reforms to the Employment Insurance (EI) program should focus on removing barriers to mobility by creating uniform, nationwide entrance requirements and benefit entitlement period” write Colin Busby and David Gray in Mending Canada’s Employment Insurance Quilt: The Case for Restoring Equity published at cdhowe.org. “Under the current EI system, long-lasting EI benefits are more easily accessed in … Continue reading
Canada / Employment Insurance : How to Adjust EI to the new world of work – Gunderson
Work is ‘changing nature’ with respect to Employment Insurance writes MORLEY GUNDERSON in EMPLOYMENT INSURANCE IN THE NEW WORLD OF WORK on mowateitaskforce.ca. “The demand-side changes include: skill-biased technological change, especially associated with the computer revolution and the shift to a knowledge economy; trade liberalization; globalization and offshore outsourcing; industrial restructuring mainly from manufacturing to … Continue reading
Discussion
No comments yet.