New research that examined joblessness in the early 2000s provides evidence that some of the problem might also be geography. A paper written by government and academic experts suggests that living near where the jobs are significantly reduces the amount of time it takes unemployed jobseekers to find work. The research found that to be especially true for blacks, women and older workers.
The so-called “spatial mismatch hypothesis,” which originally grew out of research on the effects of segregated housing markets, has been debated among economists and social scientists since the 1960s. But while there’s general agreement that “job accessibility” has some impact on unemployment duration, researchers have disagreed about how important it is and for which groups of workers.
A team from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Census Bureau, the University of Maryland and Harvard looked at job accessibility among a particular group of jobseekers: 247,000 lower-earning workers (those making less than $40,000 a year) in nine Great Lakes-region metro areas, all of whom had lost their jobs in mass layoffs. They combined data from the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages, state unemployment-insurance records and elsewhere to estimate how many jobs, at different pay grades, there were within commuting distance of each jobseeker; whether they were more likely to drive to work or take public transit; and how many other people might be competing for those jobs.
The researchers created accessibility measures for three categories of jobs: any job at all and jobs that paid 75% and 90% of what the laid-off worker’s previous job did. For all jobs, they found that moving from the 25th to the 75th percentile of accessibility reduced unemployment duration by 4.2%; for jobs that paid 90% of the previous job, better job accessibility cut unemployment duration by 7%. Blacks were 71% more sensitive to job accessibility than whites when it came to finding any new job, and 35% more sensitive when it came to finding a job that paid close to their old job.
Although the study was limited to the 2000-05 period, its conclusion — that “a worker with locally inferior access to jobs is likely to have worse labor market outcomes” — could help explain the current situation, depending on where jobs have been lost and created. What we know for sure is that as of March, more than a third (35.7%) of all unemployed Americans had been out of work for more than 26 weeks, according to the BLS. (April data will be released on Friday.) Blacks and Asians are most likely to experience extended joblessness: Last month, 44% of unemployed blacks and about as many unemployed Asians had been out of work longer than 26 weeks, versus a third of unemployed whites and 32% of unemployed Hispanics.
Chosen excerpts by Job Market Monitor. Read the whole story at Long-term unemployment is still high; new research suggests geography could be one reason | Pew Research Center.
Related articles
- Long-term unemployment in US since 1950 – A chart
- US / Long- term unemployment spans all industries, education levels, age groups, and among blue- and white-collar workers
- How Long You’ll Be Unemployed – Look at the Unemployment Rate
- Long-Term Unemployed in US – Only 11 percent have returned to steady, full-time employment a year later
- US / Twice the time to get a job than before

Discussion
Trackbacks/Pingbacks
Pingback: US – The state of the labor market in figures | Job Market Monitor - May 2, 2014
Pingback: US – Unemployment dynamics and le duration of unemployment | Job Market Monitor - May 8, 2014
Pingback: Unemployment and Wages in the US – Long-term unemployed should not be strongly discounted from measures of slack research finds | Job Market Monitor - June 3, 2014
Pingback: Long-Term Unemployment in US – The case of women and families | Job Market Monitor - June 20, 2014
Pingback: Long-Term Unemployment in US – The case of women and families | Job Market Monitor - June 20, 2014
Pingback: US – The short-term unemployment rate has returned to its pre-recession average, so what ? | Job Market Monitor - July 23, 2014
Pingback: US – Long-term unemployment might be falling for the good reason | Job Market Monitor - July 25, 2014
Pingback: US – Misconceptions about long-term unemployment | Job Market Monitor - August 19, 2014
Pingback: US Labor Secretary on Long-Term Unemployed – It keeps me up at night because their stories are so compelling | Job Market Monitor - September 1, 2014