One of the main policies to reduce long-term unemployment is an active labor market policy. The OECD publishes each year data on Government investments in labor market programs like training and wage subsidies. The term active programs is used to differentiate those measures from income support programs, like unemployment benefits, which are called passive labor market programs. The term passive is used to emphasize the fact that those measures do not act on employability or behaviour. They are nonetheless absolutely necessary. This is not the point.
Gemany and the Scandinavian countries are champions of active labor market policies. This is well known. But, less known is the fact that the US are not. US investment in active labor market programs before the Great recession was below the OECD average, nearly 4 times lower: 0.16% of GDP vs 0.62%.
It is generally admitted by labor economists that this is not the way out of the long-term unemployment trap.
In sum, an active labor market policy in an essential part of an employment policy. Left alone, monetary and fiscal policies will never suffice to reduce long term unemployment.
“Long-term unemployment rose dramatically during the recent recession and remains elevated. A primary cause may be the fact that more workers with inherently low job finding rates have become unemployed. This would suggest that the natural rate of unemployment has increased, and that additional monetary stimulus may have only a limited effect on reducing unemployment” write Andreas Hornstein, Thomas A. Lubik, and Jessie Romero in Potential Causes and Implications of the Rise in Long-Term Unemployment on richmondfed.org.
This increase in long-term unemployment is then of great consequences. It is an established fact that “ …the longer workers have been unemployed, the less likely it is that they will find jobs. This is called negative duration dependence” recalls Hornstein, Lubik, and Romero. This is also called the Hysteresis Effect.
“Data on workers who have been unemployed for fewer than 5 weeks, fewer than 15 weeks, and fewer than 27 weeks, …are consistent with negative duration dependence” as shown in Figure 2 reproduced below.
The authors conclude on the implications policy: “The natural rate of unemployment is the hypothetical rate of unemployment attainable in the absence of any distortions, such as impediments to the free adjustment of nominal prices and wages. The difference between the actual and natural rates is the “unemployment gap,” which represents the degree of slack in the economy.”
Shall we call that gap the surnatural or unnatural unemployment rate, the fact is “… that the prevalence of long-term unemployment is related to the decline in the exit rate from unemployment that occurs as unemployment duration increases. In addition, it seems that overall unemployment has increased because of the increased entry of workers with inherently low exit rates. After a long period of unemployment, affected workers may become effectively unemployable. If a large portion of long-term unemployed workers now finds it difficult to transition to employment, this suggests that the natural rate of unemployment may have increased, making the unemployment gap smaller than it appears. In this case, the level of unemployment may not be responsive to monetary stimulus, and inflationary pressures may be less constrained than it appears based on the unemployment numbers alone. Policy options that increase the ability of unemployed workers to find work and reduce the costs of generating and maintaining employment relationships thus may be more effective at reducing unemployment than additional monetary stimulus.”
Source & details @:
Read More @: Potential Causes and Implications of the Rise in Long-Term Unemployment
- Stigma Of Long-Term Unemployment Boosts Jobless Rate (huffingtonpost.com)
- 10 Depressing Charts About Long-Term Unemployment (businessinsider.com)
- Ben Bernanke: Long-Term Unemployment Crisis Altering Job Market For The Worse (huffingtonpost.com)
- The truth about long-term unemployment in America (business.financialpost.com)
Pingback: Les politiques monétaires et fiscales ne suffisent pas à reduire le chômage de longue durée | Le Blog d'InfoCompétences - September 20, 2011
Pingback: Monetary policy | Fed alone cannot cure economy’s ills: Pianalto | Reuters « Job Market Monitor - February 18, 2012
Pingback: U.S. Treasury Notes | The U.S. Economy in Charts « Global Job Gap, Local Skills Gap - March 1, 2012
Pingback: FED | Slow progress ahead on jobs | Reuters « Global Job Gap, Local Skills Gap - March 1, 2012
Pingback: Canada | A national strategy aimed at finding jobs for unemployed centrally managed « Global Job Gap, Local Skills Gap - April 19, 2012
Pingback: Bridge to Work | Experiments with unemployment insurance keep benefits to recipients in job training « Global Job Gap, Local Skills Gap - April 19, 2012
Pingback: UPDATE – Bridge to Work | Experiments with unemployment insurance keep benefits to recipients in job training « Global Job Gap, Local Skills Gap - April 20, 2012
Pingback: Unemployment in the U.S. | What Can Policy Do? « Global Job Gap, Local Skills Gap - April 27, 2012
Pingback: Lost jobs aren’t coming back and new skills are needed « Job Market Monitor - July 19, 2012
Pingback: US Unemployment System – A Bad Employment Policy « Job Market Monitor - July 21, 2012
Pingback: Labor-market failures will not be demand-side but structural, not amenable to any straightforward and easily implemented cure « Job Market Monitor - August 1, 2012
Pingback: In a Time of High Unemployment, Over 45 Million Americans Live in Poverty | MPHProgramsList.com - October 10, 2012
Pingback: Great Recession – Only half of eligible unemployed Americans collected unemployment benefits « Job Market Monitor - October 26, 2012
Pingback: Mammie Nolf - November 15, 2012
Pingback: FED / Lockhart / Aggressive Easing Needed For Jobs « Job Market Monitor - November 17, 2012
Pingback: US / FED / Dallas Fed President, Richard Fisher, says Fed might set a target for unemployment « Job Market Monitor - November 27, 2012
Pingback: US / For each dollar of federal highway grants received by a state, that state’s GSP rises by at least two dollars « Job Market Monitor - November 27, 2012
Pingback: US / The Future of Federal Workforce Development Policy – A video from Brookings Institution « Job Market Monitor - December 12, 2012
Pingback: Where The Jobs Are: ZeroHedge on The Jobs Gerontocracy « Job Market Monitor - January 4, 2013
Pingback: US / 14 Reasons for an Employment Policy « Job Market Monitor - February 4, 2013
Pingback: US Workforce Development / Layoffs At State Unemployment Agencies « Job Market Monitor - February 4, 2013
Pingback: US / It is a Long-Term Unemployment Crisis « Job Market Monitor - February 15, 2013
Pingback: US / Long-Term Unemployment Is Still High | Job Market Monitor - March 11, 2013
Pingback: Low Interest Rates Didn’t Induce Job Growth finds Research by St-Louis FED | Job Market Monitor - April 24, 2013
Pingback: President Obama / Eighth pivot to jobs | Job Market Monitor - July 22, 2013
Pingback: Unemployment and Wages in the US – Long-term unemployed should not be strongly discounted from measures of slack research finds | Job Market Monitor - June 3, 2014
Pingback: US – Federal Reserve has reduced unemployment by 0.13% | Job Market Monitor - July 15, 2014
Pingback: US – Obama to sign bill improving worker training | Job Market Monitor - July 22, 2014
Pingback: US – Reducing unemployment | Job Market Monitor - July 23, 2014