Most countries have adopted maternity protection provisions since 1919, when the ILO adopted the first Maternity Protection Convention, yet at least 830 million women workers still don’t have adequate protection, the International Labour Organization (ILO) said in a new report.
In its report, Maternity and Paternity at Work: Law and practice across the world, the ILO said 66 countries out of 185 countries and territories have committed to at least one of three maternity protection Conventions adopted in 1919, 1952 and in 2000.
These Conventions stipulate the prevention of exposure to health and safety hazards during pregnancy and nursing, entitlement to paid maternity leave, maternal and child health and breastfeeding breaks, and protection against discrimination and dismissal in relation to maternity, as well as a guaranteed right to return to work after maternity leave.
KEY FACTS AND FIGURES
- 66 out of 185 countries and territories have ratified at least one of the three ILO maternity protection Conventions.
- 53 per cent (98 countries) meet the ILO standard of at least 14 weeks maternity leave.
- 58 per cent (107 countries) now finance maternity leave cash benefits through social security. Between 1994 and 2013 financing of cash benefits through employer liability fell from 33 to 25 per cent.
- A large majority of women workers, around 830 million, are not adequately covered in practice, mainly in developing countries.
- 45 per cent (74 countries) provide cash benefits of at least two-thirds of earnings for at least 14 weeks – an overall increase of 3 per cent since the last ILO review in 2010.
- A statutory right to paternity leave is found in 78 of the 167 countries. Leave is paid in 70 of these, underlining the trend of greater involvement of fathers around childbirth. In 1994, paternity leave existed in 40 of 141 countries with available data.
- 75 per cent (121 countries out of 160) provide for daily nursing breaks after maternity leave.
via Maternity and paternity at work: Maternity protection makes headway amid vast global gaps.
Related Posts
Maternity and paternity at work around the world – An ILO Report
The year 2019 will mark both the ILO’s 100th anniversary and the first centenary of international labour standards on maternity protection. In fact, protecting maternity at work was one of the primary concerns of the ILO. It was during the first International Labour Conference in 1919 that the first Convention on maternity protection (Convention No. … Continue reading
Moms in US / Trailing on Paid Leave
…Only 12 percent of workers get paid time off to care for a baby or a sick parent, according to the U.S. Labor Department. Rhode Island this month became the third state to start a paid family leave insurance program, which was initiated by California in 2004 and by New Jersey in 2009. A bill introduced … Continue reading
Paternity Leave / What happens when men cut back on work to fulfill family obligations?
Research shows that working men and women tend to make different adjustments when they become parents. Women typically resolve work-family conflicts by reducing their work hours, whereas men typically increase their work hours. And when women take maternity leave or temporarily cut back to part-time, many employers, rightly or wrongly, perceive them to be less … Continue reading
Family and Medical Leave in US / Job Protection Isn’t Enough
Twenty years ago, the Family and Medical Leave Act, or FMLA, was signed into law. Without downplaying the historical significance of the FMLA’s guarantee of job-protected leave for a majority of U.S. workers, it had a limited impact on the frequency of parental leave and no impact on the likelihood that parental leave is paid Continue reading
Job Market Monitor 
Discussion
Trackbacks/Pingbacks
Pingback: Job Search and Maternity Benefits in UK – 78% feel asking about in a job interview would jeopardise their chances | Job Market Monitor - November 12, 2014