A new benchmark called the Empowerment Line, developed by the McKinsey Global Institute, aims to create a new and more holistic policy framework for poverty reduction. It calculates the cost for an Indian household to attain the basics and then compares these benchmarks to actual consumption data to measure needs that are going unmet. The results debunk a number of misconceptions about the nature of poverty in India.
Myth #1: Just 22 percent of Indians are poor. This is Indias official poverty rate, but it counts only those in the most abject circumstances — and even a cursory scan of Indias human development indicators suggests more widespread deprivation. The Empowerment Line reveals that 56 percent of Indians, some 680 million, lack the means to meet their basic needs. Just above the official poverty line, some 413 million are “vulnerable.” They have only a tenuous grip on a better standard of living, and shocks such as illness or a lost job can easily push them back into desperate circumstances.Myth #2: Food is the biggest unmet need of Indias poor. Hunger remains a daily fact of life for the poorest of the poor. But health care, drinking water, and sanitation constitute 40 percent of the populations unmet needs by value. Indias national debate on poverty tends to focus on calorie sufficiency rather than these critical services. On average, Indians lack access to over half the health care infrastructure and services they need.
Myth #3: Rising incomes are the key to a better quality of life. This observation is true — but only up to a point. With higher incomes and purchasing power, people can afford better housing, sanitation, drinking water, and fuel for cooking and lighting. But the ability to spend is only one side of the equation. The poor also depend on community-level infrastructure such as schools and health-care networks. On average, Indians lack access to 46 percent of basic services, and that number soars up to 59 percent for the most deprived districts of Uttar Pradesh and Bihar.
Myth #4: Rising welfare budgets were the most important factor in past poverty reduction. India has been committing more resources to social welfare. Public spending for basic services rose by some 11 percent per year in real terms from 2005 to 2012, eventually reaching $118 billion. But about half of this spending did not translate into real benefits for the poor due to waste, corruption, or simple ineffectiveness. Rising government spending did drive about one-fourth of poverty reduction from 2005 to 2012, but jobs and rising incomes accounted for most of the progress that was achieved.
Myth #5: More subsidies and social transfers can eradicate poverty in the future. The additional consumption required to raise 680 million Indians to the standards of the Empowerment Line is equivalent to about 4 percent of GDP. India lacks the fiscal resources to support a spending increase of this magnitude — and even if it found the money, its track record of leakage and ineffective spending would limit the gains to the poor. Yet it is feasible to lift some 580 million people over the Empowerment Line in the next decade. Some 90 percent of this impact depends on non-farm job creation, faster agricultural productivity growth, and more effective delivery of services. Policymakers can set this process in motion by focusing on infrastructure delivery, easing the regulatory burden facing businesses, tax and product market reforms, land market reform, labor market flexibility, and workforce skills. These changes can set off a virtuous cycle of growth that generates more revenue, enabling India to meet its fiscal targets even as it ploughs additional funding back into social services.
Chosen excerpts by Job Market Monitor. Read the whole story at
Growth for employment creation needs to be given priority over everything else. The number of voters has gone up by a hundred million between 2009 and 2014. In other words, something like 20 million people are entering the job market each year. Add to that the need to move employment from the agricultural to the … Continue reading
Jobs in India grew by just 2.2% between 2010 and 2012. Economist Alakh N Sharma, director of the Institute of Human Development and principal author of India Labour and Employment Report 2014, spoke with Rema Nagarajan about why unemployment is rising, the people it hits hardest, manufacturing as a remedy — and how competitiveness goes … Continue reading
(Guest post by Sarah Brooks*) – The world is watching as the General Election unfolds in India, with many hoping that a possible election of Narendra Modi as Prime Minister will give the Indian economy the jolt it so desperately needs. The new leader will definitely have his work cut out for him, as India … Continue reading
I am constantly surprised at how often in conversations with thoughtful people this statistic is brought up: that, from now on for the next decade, every year 12 million young Indians will arrive in the job market. And this additional statistic is brought up too: that in the past few years, the organised sector in … Continue reading
Job opportunities in the market may have become fewer, but that is not stopping 85% of the total workforce from eyeing greener pastures. Most employees are either actively looking for a job or open to talking to recruiters about relevant opportunities, says an annual exit survey by LinkedIn. The number of employees looking to exit … Continue reading
Pursuing an “inclusive reforms” agenda that boosts investments and generates more jobs will help to significantly reduce poverty in India, where over half of the population struggle to meet their essential needs, McKinsey Global Institute (MGI) said today. MGI, business and economics research arm of global consultancy major McKinsey & Company, has also projected that … Continue reading