Report

Transition to Shorter Working Week in UK – Time spent in work is neither natural nor inevitable

This report aims to demonstrate that the time we spend in work is neither natural nor inevitable. Instead, the amount of time we spend in work is a political question. One of the central aims of this report is to establish time itself as a site of political contestation – in the same vein as housing, healthcare, income, and national defence.
The time people spend in the workplace has varied dramatically throughout history, and still today varies widely between countries. What today we consider to be a ‘natural’ amount of time to spend at work is a relatively recent invention. The nine-to- ve, ve-days- a-week model for full-time work has been dominant for just 50 years, and even that is rapidly beginning to change. This report is contemporary with a number of innovative models of work-time reduction currently in practice within the UK and internationally.

  • We note the worrying trends of job polarisation, the explosion of precarious forms of work, gendered inequalities, stagnating productivity growth, the threat (and promise) of automation and the substantial inequality that exists in our society.
  • Throughout the report, we make the case that the shorter working week is a powerful and practical response to some of these trends. Importantly, it should be understood that the transition towards a shorter working week is possible now and is not an abstract utopia.
  • We show that there is no positive correlation between productivity and the amount of hours worked per day: working to the bone does not make ‘business sense’.
  • There are strong indications that reducing the working week can help reduce air pollution and our overall carbon footprint.
  • We consider research concerning the importance of non-work time for our mental and physical health and for our sense of wellbeing in general.
  • Waged work and unwaged work – such as that which is carried out in the home – should be considered as two sides of one ensemble.
  • We make the case that productivity should not be the burden of workers alone.
  • Sector-wide trade union coverage is an appropriate component of the decision-making around automation.
  • We consider various case studies where a shorter working week was implemented with varying degrees of success.
  • We argue that ultimately, a more universal approach to working time reduction is the best way to prevent a ‘new dualism’ between those who can afford free time and those who cannot.

via The Shorter Working Week: a report from Autonomy – Autonomy

Discussion

No comments yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Jobs – Offres d’emploi – US & Canada (Eng. & Fr.)

The Most Popular Job Search Tools

Even More Objectives Statements to customize

Cover Letters – Tools, Tips and Free Cover Letter Templates for Microsoft Office

Follow Job Market Monitor on WordPress.com

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Follow Job Market Monitor via Twitter

Categories

Archives

%d bloggers like this: