In Don’t Fear the Robots: Why Automation Doesn’t Mean the End of Work, Roosevelt Fellow Mark Paul challenges the narrative that large-scale automation will imminently lead to mass unemployment and economic insecurity. He debunks the idea that we are on the cusp of a major technological change that will drastically alter the nature of work, leave Americans unemployed, and exacerbate already high levels of economic inequality.
Paul argues that the way automation affects economic security is largely structured by the underlying rules of our economy. Workers are right to be concerned about the negative effects of technological change because the historical link between labor productivity and wages, which grew side-by-side for most of the 20th century, is broken. Paul draws on data to show that while some workers will face short-term job loss, there is nothing to indicate that automation will lead to the end of work. However, we cannot trivialize the costs of this kind of economic transition for workers in the short term, nor can we ignore the structural disadvantages in today’s economy that define economic outcomes.
In order to fix this broken link, Paul proposes several policy changes that would ensure that the economic benefits from technological change are widespread:
- Full employment: The U.S. government should recommit to pursuing full employment. Implementing full employment would create a significantly tighter labor market, which would both encourage technological advance and nullify the potential negative effects of technology on workers.
- Revised intellectual property law: Intellectual property law is a primary reason why technological advances currently exacerbate inequality. While a first step would be reducing the lengths of patents and copyright protections, more substantial measures should also be pursued.
- Public guidance in technological development: Government has a sizeable role in leading the direction of innovation through funding research and establishing research agencies. The government should focus on tech innovations that complement workers.
- Work sharing: The U.S. should adopt work sharing in two ways. First, in reducing the overall hours typically worked by individuals; and second, by temporarily reducing working hours during economic downturns, rather than laying off workers.
- Free higher education and vocational training: Education and training are vital components in advancing society and maintaining a productive workforce. More accessible options should be made available to the public.
Evidence does not show that rapid automation is here, or even that it is just around the corner. But it is clear that technological advances in the past few decades have not lead to broad-based economic growth. To combat inequality and unemployment and rebuild an economy where productivity gains directly translate into higher living standards for all, Paul reiterates that the institutions currently governing our economy must be transformed.
Chosen excerpts by Job Market Monitor. Read the whole story at Don’t Fear the Robots: Why Automation Doesn’t Mean the End of Work – Roosevelt Institute
Pingback: Future of Work and the Skills Gap – A net positive outlook for jobs, while no less than 54% of all employees will require significant re- and upskilling by 2022, | Job Market Monitor - October 24, 2018
Pingback: The Future of Work – Five policies to help the middle class from displacement | Job Market Monitor - December 15, 2018
Pingback: Future of Work – Fostering the benefits of new technologies requires good measures of their impact | Job Market Monitor - January 23, 2019
Pingback: The Future of Work in US – Five policy strategies for adjusting to automation | Job Market Monitor - March 4, 2019
Pingback: The Future of Work – Artificial Intelligence (AI) impacts on learning, teaching, and education | Job Market Monitor - April 1, 2019
Pingback: Wage Growth Slowdown in Australia – The extent and causes | Job Market Monitor - April 15, 2019
Pingback: Wages – Decline in organized labor has reduced the bargaining power of labor across the developed world Bridgewater says | Job Market Monitor - April 18, 2019
Pingback: The Future of Work and Skills Acquisition – A shift in mindset is needed | Job Market Monitor - August 21, 2019
Pingback: The Geography of the Future of Work in US – A mosaic of local economies on diverging trajectories | Job Market Monitor - August 31, 2019
Pingback: Wages in US – What is really happening ? | Job Market Monitor - September 12, 2019