Politics & Policies

Skilled Immigration in Australia – The great majority of those visaed in the skill program are professionals, an increasing share of whom hold occupations that are oversupplied

As vexations flowing from record high net overseas migration mount, supporters of the permanent entry program have had to dig deeper to defend it.

These supporters include the Treasury and the Reserve Bank as well as business and property interests. They say that any major cut to the migration program would put in jeopardy Australia’s 26 years of unbroken nominal economic growth. The Treasury emphasises that Commonwealth taxation revenue would also diminish, putting further pressure on the budget deficit.

Whatever the truth of these assertions, they do not cut much ice with the majority of voters who now think that immigration levels should be reduced. The Coalition government has had resort to other justifications. The chief one is that Australia’s permanent entry skill program is delivering scarce skills vital to Australia’s economic health. According to the PM, Malcolm Turnbull, it is ‘state of the art’ in this respect.

The focus of this paper is on whether these claims have any substance. They do not. This conclusion is based on recent unpublished data on the occupations of those visaed in the skill program. The key findings are:

1. The great majority of those visaed in the skill program are professionals, an increasing share of whom hold occupations that are oversupplied. On the other hand, it is delivering a negligible number of construction trade workers. This is despite housing industry claims that continued skilled migration is crucial to supplying the workers needed to provide the housing and infrastructure to accommodate Australia’s booming population.

2. You might think that a skill program directed at recruiting scarce skills would prioritise the relevant occupations. That is not the case. In 2010 a Skills Occupation List (SOL) was introduced that made selection conditional on the applicant’s occupation being in national shortage. Since that time this condition has been wound back, to be finally abolished in 2016.

3. The SOL has been replaced by a Medium to Long-Term Strategic Skill List (MLTSSL). This makes selection conditional on whether an occupation might be needed in two to ten years’ time. The MLTSSL includes numerous professions that the government’s own Department of Employment has judged to be oversupplied, including accounting and engineering.

As a consequence, most recently arrived skilled migrants cannot find professional jobs. This statement is based on new findings from the 2016 Census on the employment situation of skilled migrants who arrived in Australian over the years 2011-2016.

A huge number (256,504) of overseas born persons aged 25-34 who held degree or above level qualifications at the time of the Census arrived in Australia over these years The vast majority, 84 per cent, came from Non-English-Speaking-Countries (NESC). Just (16 per cent) came from Main- English-Speaking-Countries (MESC).

Only 24 per cent of the NESC group were employed as professionals as of 2016, compared with 50 per cent of the MESCs and 58 per cent of the same aged Australian-born graduates.

Australia is awash with graduates – as a consequence of past migration and growth in domestic university completions. By 2017, 38.5 per cent of Australian residents aged 25-29 held degree level qualifications and 40.3 per cent of those aged 30-34. This is high by international standards.

The recent surge in undergraduate commencements, particularly in the STEM disciplines, means that this trend will continue.


These findings mean that it is unlikely Australia will need any augmentation of its stock of professionals from migrant sources.

The Skill Stream program is deeply flawed. The paper explores its deficiencies. They go far deeper than the absence of any mechanism to select skills in short supply. For instance, the large State Sponsorship Category gives states the rights to sponsor skilled migrants but allows them to settle wherever they wish in Australia.

The program is not needed. Australia’s employers would hardly notice if it was abolished.

The skill program, and its claims to be providing essential skills, is acting as a screen for its real purpose. This is to deliver the continued high population growth Australia’s elites want.


Chosen excerpts by Job Market Monitor. Read the whole story at  Australia’s skilled migration program: scarce skills not required

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Jobs – Offres d’emploi – US & Canada (Eng. & Fr.)

The Most Popular Job Search Tools

Even More Objectives Statements to customize

Cover Letters – Tools, Tips and Free Cover Letter Templates for Microsoft Office

Follow Job Market Monitor on WordPress.com

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Follow Job Market Monitor via Twitter



%d bloggers like this: