Report

US / Fiscal Cliff and Unemployment Insurance: four options to extend benefits and their costs

The unemployment insurance (UI) system is a partnership between the federal government and state governments that provides a temporary weekly benefit to qualified workers who lose their job and are seeking work. The amount of that benefit is based in part on a worker’s past earnings. CBO estimates that UI benefits totaled $94 billion in fiscal year 2012 (when the unemployment rate was 8.3 percent, on average), a substantial increase over the $33 billion paid out in fiscal year 2007 (when the unemployment rate was 4.5 percent, on average).

Beginning in 2008, Increased Layoffs and Changes in the Unemployment Insurance System Have Expanded the Number of Recipients and Federal Spending for Benefits

Far more workers were laid off in 2008 and 2009 than in 2006 and 2007. The number of workers who lost their job and started receiving UI benefits peaked at 14.4 million in 2009, whereas an average of roughly 8 million laid-off workers started receiving benefits in each fiscal year from 2004 to 2007. Having so many more workers eligible for unemployment benefits would have substantially increased the number of recipients in the absence of any change in UI policies, but federal policies also were changed in ways that further expanded the number of UI recipients.

In particular, the periods for which eligible workers can receive UI benefits have been repeatedly extended during the recent recession and its aftermath. Regular UI benefits generally last up to 26 weeks. Additional weeks of benefits have been provided through the creation of the temporary Emergency Unemployment Compensation (EUC) program in 2008 and through modifications to the extended benefits (EB) program. The EUC program currently provides up to 47 weeks of additional benefits (depending on a state’s unemployment rate) after regular UI benefits have been exhausted. The EB program provides up to 20 weeks of benefits to certain eligible workers who have exhausted their EUC benefits (temporary changes in law have made it easier for states to qualify to provide extended benefits and have made the funding for the EB program entirely federal).

The benefits the three programs provide—at a total cost over the past five years of roughly $520 billion—have allowed households to better maintain their consumption while household members are unemployed. Under current law, the temporary benefits that have been provided in recent years are set to expire at the end of December 2012.

With Temporary Benefits Set to Expire, CBO Considered Several Options—with Costs Ranging from $3 Billion to $30 Billion—To Continue Offering Additional Weeks of UI Benefits

The four options to extend benefits—including their estimated costs to the federal budget—are as follows:

Option 1. Fully extend the current EUC program and temporary provisions of the EB program for one year ($30 billion);

Option 2. Partially extend the current EUC program by providing at most 14 extra weeks of benefits for one year ($14 billion);

Option 3. Allow UI recipients to finish receiving up to 14 weeks of EUC benefits, depending on the number of weeks of benefits for which they will qualify at the end of December 2012 ($4 billion); and

Option 4. Extend the current EB program for one year, maintaining full federal funding and allowing states to more easily qualify for the program ($3 billion).

Separate from the options that would extend benefits, CBO considered another alternative that would provide temporary fiscal relief to states by delaying for one year the repayment of funds they have borrowed from the Unemployment Trust Fund, which is funded by a federal payroll tax on employers. Under that option, the federal government would forgo about $3 billion of revenue in 2013 but would collect roughly that same amount in subsequent years…

Choosen excerpts by Job Market Monitor from

via CBO | Unemployment Insurance in the Wake of the Recent Recession.

Full Report @:

Related Posts

Fiscal Cliff / Unemployment Benefits will abruptly end for 2 million in dec., and nearly one million more in the first quarter of 2013

POSTED BY  ⋅ NOVEMBER 26, 2012 ⋅ 3 COMMENTS

Because over five million workers will be unable to collect federal UI benefits next year if Congress fails to act, NELP is calling upon Congress to make this issue a priority during the lame-duck session of the 112th Congress. Not only should Congress reauthorize the EUC program in its current form for the next year, it … Continue reading »

US | Fiscal Cliff | 2 million jobless Americans could lose UI

POSTED BY  ⋅ NOVEMBER 10, 2012 ⋅ 2 COMMENTS

Congress last lengthened the deadline to file for benefits in February, but lawmakers also restructured the program at the time. The maximum number of weeks the jobless can collect unemployment benefits was reduced to 73 weeks. And in all states save New York, the jobless are no longer eligible for a separate federal extended benefits … Continue reading »

California / Fiscal Cliff / 400,000 long-term jobless on the edge

POSTED BY  ⋅ NOVEMBER 28, 2012 ⋅ LEAVE A COMMENT

The federal budget crisis in Washington known as the “fiscal cliff” has an estimated 400,000 long-term jobless Californians on the edge. A 41/2 -year-old program of emergency federal jobless assistance, which provides many of the state’s unemployed up to $450 a week in benefits, is scheduled to expire Dec. 29 — unless Congress and President … Continue reading »

US | CBO | Unemployment lower in the next few years if the fiscal cliff removed

POSTED BY  ⋅ NOVEMBER 9, 2012 ⋅ 3 COMMENTS

Substantial changes to tax and spending policies are scheduled to take effect in January 2013, significantly reducing the federal budget deficit. According to CBO’s projections, if all of that fiscal tightening occurs, real (inflation-adjusted) gross domestic product (GDP) will drop by 0.5 percent in 2013 (as measured by the change from the fourth quarter of … Continue reading »

Fiscal policy, at both the federal and state and local levels: headwinds for unemployment reduction says Bernanke

POSTED BY  ⋅ AUGUST 31, 2012 ⋅ 6 COMMENTS

The accommodative monetary policies I have reviewed today, both traditional and nontraditional, have provided important support to the economic recovery while helping to maintain price stability… Notwithstanding these positive signs, the economic situation is obviously far from satisfactory… Further, the rate of improvement in the labor market has been painfully slow. I have noted on …Continue reading »

FED / Lockhart / Aggressive Easing Needed For Jobs

POSTED BY  ⋅ NOVEMBER 17, 2012 ⋅ 2 COMMENTS

Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta President Dennis Lockhart said forceful central bank policies will remain needed to spur job growth even if Congress averts sudden tax increases and spending cuts at the end of the year. “I expect that continued aggressive use of balance sheet monetary tools will be appropriate and justified by economic conditions … Continue reading »

Discussion

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Pingback: Fiscal Cliff / Unemployment Benefits will abruptly end for 2 million in dec., and nearly one million more in the first quarter of 2013 « Job Market Monitor - November 28, 2012

  2. Pingback: Chiganu - November 28, 2012

  3. Pingback: Shaira - November 28, 2012

  4. Pingback: Ebe - November 28, 2012

  5. Pingback: Killa - November 28, 2012

  6. Pingback: Marny - November 28, 2012

  7. Pingback: Dallas - November 28, 2012

  8. Pingback: Lori - November 28, 2012

  9. Pingback: Unemployment Insurance / Its Importance for American Families and the Economy « Job Market Monitor - December 4, 2012

  10. Pingback: Fiscal Cliff / UI Benefits will end for 3 M: A Brief Overview of the Legislative Procedures for Adjusting the Public Debt Limit « Job Market Monitor - December 5, 2012

  11. Pingback: US / Democrats want jobless benefits in Fiscal Cliff deal « Job Market Monitor - December 9, 2012

  12. Pingback: Fiscal Cliff / Focusing attention on partisan maneuvers « Job Market Monitor - December 11, 2012

  13. Pingback: Fiscal Cliff / Federal employees- from skeptical to alarmed « Job Market Monitor - December 26, 2012

  14. Pingback: Fiscal Cliff / The Impact on American Jobs « Job Market Monitor - December 26, 2012

  15. Pingback: California / Saving Unemployment Insurance | Job Market Monitor - April 19, 2013

  16. Pingback: COVID and Unemployment Insurance in US – How to make it work for all | Job Market Monitor - April 15, 2020

  17. Pingback: COVID and Unemployment Insurance in US – How to make it work for all | Job Market Monitor - April 15, 2020

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Jobs – Offres d’emploi – US & Canada (Eng. & Fr.)

The Most Popular Job Search Tools

Even More Objectives Statements to customize

Cover Letters – Tools, Tips and Free Cover Letter Templates for Microsoft Office

Follow Job Market Monitor on WordPress.com

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Follow Job Market Monitor via Twitter

Categories

Archives

%d bloggers like this: